Individual Student Needs: What Strong Observation Evidence Can Look Like

Because Washington districts use approved instructional frameworks within TPEP, teachers should pair these resources with the exact locally adopted framework and criteria. For Individual Student Needs, the strongest preparation question is not “Did I mention it?” but “What student evidence will make this part of Washington TPEP observable?”

A classroom micro-scenario

Based on prior work, the teacher pre-selects vocabulary support for one group, a visual model for another, and an extension prompt for students already showing mastery.

Teacher moves that fit this component

• use evidence rather than assumptions to plan support
• preserve the same essential thinking
• build flexible supports that can fade

Evidence students can produce

• supports match actual needs
• students access the same core goal
• grouping changes as evidence changes

What an administrator may be able to see

• multiple access supports for the same essential thinking
• teacher response to specific learner evidence rather than fixed ability labels
• extension that deepens reasoning instead of merely adding more work

What students might be doing

• use a scaffold, model, vocabulary support, or representation without losing the core task
• select a support and then explain thinking
• pursue deeper transfer or complexity when ready

What students might be saying

• “This organizer helped me show the same reasoning…”
• “I used the model first, then I tried it without the model.”
• “My extension changes the context, not just the number of problems.”

Artifacts that can make evidence concrete

• scaffolded and unscaffolded versions of the same cognitive task
• language supports or visual models
• extension prompts requiring transfer, critique, or synthesis

Weak evidence vs. stronger evidence

Common missed opportunities

• Individual Student Needs is named in the lesson plan but no student behavior demonstrates it.
• The teacher can explain the intent, but the observer would have to infer too much because the evidence remains hidden.
• Only one student produces the evidence, so it is difficult to judge how broadly learning is occurring.
• The teacher collects information but the next instructional move does not respond to it.

Planning questions for Individual Student Needs

1. At what exact moment should Individual Student Needs become visible?
2. What should students be doing differently because this component is strong?
3. What student language would tell me the intended thinking is actually happening?
4. What artifact, response, or behavior can provide evidence beyond my own explanation?
5. What will I change if the evidence is weaker or stronger than expected?

Related Washington TPEP components