Grade + subject application
Danielson Questioning in Middle School Math
Use multiple solution paths, error analysis, justification, and student-to-student comparison of reasoning.
Framework context: Use the Danielson lens to make planning, classroom culture, questioning, engagement, and assessment evidence visible through authentic student learning.
What this can look like in Middle School Math
- students responding to one another instead of routing every idea through the teacher
- a prompt that requires evidence, reasoning, comparison, or critique
- participation structures that make thinking visible beyond the quickest volunteers
Student evidence
- explain a claim and cite evidence
- build on or challenge a peer idea
- revise an explanation after hearing another perspective
Possible artifacts
- discussion tracker or participation map
- annotated source, problem, or text evidence
- student-generated questions or synthesis notes
Common weak version: The teacher asks many questions, but most are recall-based and answered by the same few students.
Stronger version: Students use evidence to respond to peers, explain reasoning, ask follow-up questions, and refine ideas while the teacher probes rather than dominates the conversation.