Florida FEAPs component guide
Instructional Design and Lesson Planning: What Strong Observation Evidence Can Look Like
Quick answer: Planning is visible in the coherence among standards, learning purpose, success criteria, task sequence, anticipated misconceptions, and assessment evidence.
Connect instructional design, learning environment, delivery, assessment, and professional improvement to purposeful student work and responsive teaching. For Instructional Design and Lesson Planning, the strongest preparation question is not “Did I mention it?” but “What student evidence will make this part of Florida FEAPs observable?”
A classroom micro-scenario
The lesson begins with a diagnostic prompt tied to prior knowledge, moves into a task requiring the target thinking, and includes a planned branch if the diagnostic reveals a misconception.
Teacher moves that fit this component
- align target, task, and evidence
- anticipate likely misconceptions
- plan decision points before teaching
Evidence students can produce
- activities clearly serve the target
- assessment matches the intended thinking
- instruction adapts along planned contingencies
What an administrator may be able to see
- a learning target connected to a meaningful task
- success criteria that describe quality of thinking or performance
- lesson sequencing that anticipates prior knowledge and likely misconceptions
What students might be doing
- explain what they are learning and how they will know they are successful
- connect prior learning to the new task
- use criteria during work rather than only after grading
What students might be saying
- “Today we are learning to…, and I will know I can when…”
- “This connects to yesterday because…”
- “My work meets this criterion, but not this one yet.”
Artifacts that can make evidence concrete
- standards-to-task alignment map
- student-facing success criteria
- planned misconception and response notes
Weak evidence vs. stronger evidence
Weak or incomplete evidence: The lesson contains objectives and activities, but the connection between them is unclear to students.
Stronger evidence: The target, task, success criteria, and assessment all point to the same essential thinking, and students can explain that alignment in their own words.
Common missed opportunities
- Instructional Design and Lesson Planning is named in the lesson plan but no student behavior demonstrates it.
- The teacher can explain the intent, but the observer would have to infer too much because the evidence remains hidden.
- Only one student produces the evidence, so it is difficult to judge how broadly learning is occurring.
- The teacher collects information but the next instructional move does not respond to it.
Planning questions for Instructional Design and Lesson Planning
- At what exact moment should Instructional Design and Lesson Planning become visible?
- What should students be doing differently because this component is strong?
- What student language would tell me the intended thinking is actually happening?
- What artifact, response, or behavior can provide evidence beyond my own explanation?
- What will I change if the evidence is weaker or stronger than expected?
Related Florida FEAPs components
Apply Instructional Design and Lesson Planning to your lesson
Go Distinguished can use Florida FEAPs as the selected framework and strengthen the actual lesson you plan to teach.
Strengthen my lesson for $1.99